Pages Navigation Menu

Links to information about Overland Scout situation

Posted by on Mar 28, 2011 in Blog, Law and Ethics, News, Scholastic Journalism, Teaching | 0 comments

Share

Those interested in the censorship issue at Overland High in Colorado can follow the events by checking the sites below:

NEW LINKS:

— As school backpedals, Colorado students still fighting newspaper censorship

Overland high school newspaper threatened with closure to survive after ACLU complaint

Colorado High School newspaper to shut down, principal didn’t like story about student death

• Denver Post

Overland High’s principal trying to stop the student presses

Overland principal not blocking student paper over content, district says

• SPLC

Colorado principal fires adviser, shutters newspaper

• Aurora Sentinel

Overland Scout staff protest principal’s moves

• Denver Daily News

A high school paper war

• Huffington Post

Colorado principal nixes student newspaper for knowing too much

• Miscellaneous pieces

Censorship 101: Angry Colorado principal shuts down high school paper

Scout article about the student’s death

Censor This Facebook page by Overland Scout students

45words comments

High School Newspaper

•  The Great Writ

• Fight for the Right to Write

• ACLU

Petition against censorship at Overland

The First Amendment blog

 

 

Read More

#sjw11: As journalism teachers our job is to fight censorship

Posted by on Feb 24, 2011 in Blog, Law and Ethics, News, Scholastic Journalism, Teaching | 0 comments

Share

Teaching journalism is rewarding, but can become frightening and frustrating when advisers face prior review and/or censorship as part of their daily expectations.

A key decision to fight censorship, Adam Goldstein, SPLC attorney advocate said, is for journalism teachers who live with prior review or restraint  to do more than recognize its educational weaknesses.

Their job, he said, is to oppose it as best they can.

“Prior review sends the message that actions don’t have consequences because there’s always someone else who can clean up your mistakes,” Goldstein said in an interview. “People who grow up in an environment without consequences don’t function well in the real world.”

JEA knows some teachers may face job loss if they try to protect student learning. We know sometimes there is no other choice but to do as ordered.

Still, we urge all teachers to consider these points:

Advisers teach professional approaches to journalism – whether in gathering information, in providing leadership through coverage or opinion or in presenting the information accurately, completely and coherently.

Limiting this process strips any pretense of student learning, critical thinking or application of principles schools teach. It also strips away information citizens need to maintain civic engagement.

“The entire gamble of representative democracy is that people make good choices in their own best interest when provided with honest information,” Goldstein said.

Students learn most when they practice responsible journalism.  When advisers are required to accept censorship or censor students’ work themselves, they are placed in an untenable position undermining what they strive to teach.

“Aspirationally,” Goldstein said, “If the goal of education is to prepare students for their role in society, nothing is more essential to that role than the ability to create and disseminate their thoughts. The entire marketplace of ideas that makes our democracy function depends on it.”

Students and communities suffer when censorship exists.

“Censorship of high school students creates new citizens in that democracy who think, first, that the information isn’t honest; and second, that they aren’t free to share their own information,” Goldstein said. “These days people look at the political process and wonder how it got so hostile, misinformed and regressive, and then shrug their shoulders when, every day in high schools, students are told not to tell the truth.”

Learning to report material responsibly is a unique opportunity denied students who face censorship. The exciting part of advising and teaching journalism is watching students expand their ideas and become educated not only in the specifics of media but also about the importance of a free press in a democracy.

“Prior restraint is even more troubling because it undermines everything we try to instill in students about the American way of life,” Goldstein said. “The ability to just remove the right to free expression from anyone is something that is irreconcilable with our political system. So students get cynical about it and think administrators are liars.”

Reviewing media materials, while not illegal, has no legitimate educational value. Advisers need to educate themselves, their administrators and their communities about students’ legal rights, ethical responsibilities and educational obligations.

“Journalism and social studies teachers end up suffering the most when they turn a blind eye to student rights because they are the ones tasked with inculcating a respect for the values that censorship violates,” Goldstein said. “It’s one thing if a science teacher chooses not to believe in the basic functions of democracy, but if your journalism teacher doesn’t think speech is important, it suggests that nobody thinks this is important.”

Some administrators are unaware there is no legal or educational rationale for censorship. Teachers can help them understand the value of journalism to all stakeholders. Journalism education organizations can enhance the ongoing education of all parties.

The full measure of the Hazelwood decision, CSPA director Edmund J. Sullivan said in a JEA listserv discussion, won’t be felt until the generation of advisers working before 1988 leaves the scene.

That is now happening.

Knight chair for Scholastic Journalism Mark Goodman said in hundreds, maybe thousands of high schools around the country, there is no censorship.

“It is possible to create an environment in your student media program that supports the values of our democracy and does something other than teach students how ‘journalism’ is practiced in China,” Goodman said.

At other schools, that may take time, he said, but it’s worth striving for and doesn’t have to risk your job in the process.

“The one thing that I think is vital — our most important obligation —” Goodman said, is “we HAVE to teach students that censorship is wrong, morally, educationally, journalistically, even when it cannot be avoided or overcome. And we have to do it in such a way that we don’t make kids so cynical they think the entire idea of the First Amendment is a joke.”

Read More

Predictions for 2010?

Posted by on Dec 29, 2010 in Blog, News, Scholastic Journalism | 0 comments

Share

“Old Media/New Tricks” is gathering predictions for media in 2010.  Using Twitter, the blog’s creators are urging 140-character tweets about what others see in the coming year.

They said their tweet would be:

2010 media predictions: More collaboration (soon with Wave), tablets on the rise, mobile strategies emerge, paywalls lose favor. #Media2010

I posted one:

My prediction for STUDENT media in 2010: More newsroom pros will step up & help us fight censorship. Or is that simply my hope? #Media2010

What would yours be? Respond to this blog but also post your own tweet using the #Media2010 hashtag.


Read More

More links to Minnesota censorship issue

Posted by on Nov 18, 2010 in Blog, Law and Ethics, News, Scholastic Journalism, Teaching | 0 comments

Share

You may have already heard about the censorship issue of the Knight Errant (the publication of Benilde-St. Margaret in Minnesota).

To help you follow the situation, here are local media links:

• This is the statement on the Knight Errant’s website by the principal. The original editorial and column can be seen here.

• Minnesota Post

Minnesota Public Radio

City Pages

Advocate

• School pulls op-ed pieces (includes links to the student media website)

The press rights commission urges you and your students to read and to post comments.

Read More

Save your high school newspaper

Posted by on Oct 27, 2010 in Law and Ethics, News, Scholastic Journalism, Teaching | 0 comments

Share

A re-Tweet from Cheryl Pell of Michigan State University caught my attention today.

Pell highlighted an MSU student’s blog called New Media Shift and written by a former high school journalist, Erica Shekell of Howell, Michican. Shekell urged others to write letters in support of their student newspapers. Why? Because student newspapers in particular – and some say newspapers everywhere – are in trouble.

We have seen continuing instances of that in the last few years. Censorship. Media shut down because of decreasing funding. Refocusing on other curricular areas to meet the needs of a test-hungry educational system. Varieties of reasons.

So Shekell created a challenge: “write to your old newspaper teacher (or find the old one) and write to the administrators and school board in support of your high school newspaper. Let them know why newspapers are still important and why reading from a textbook can never replace first-hand journalism experience.”

As she asks, “what did your high school paper do for you?”

Let’s join her in not only asking that question and but in answering it. Write your school boards and your local media. Stress the value of journalism in schools, in communities, in the country.

The student newspaper you save might be your own.

Read More